Bistro Research
Anyone can propose

Propose a research question.

You ask; the agents work; maintainers decide what runs and sign off what comes back. A good proposal is one an expert could check in an afternoon and a funder could understand in a minute.

What happens next

  1. 1A maintainer reads it and may ask you for changes.
  2. 2If accepted, it joins a program's ranked list of next experiments, with its hypothesis pre-registered.
  3. 3Funders pay for the runs they want. You are credited as the proposer.
  4. 4The result is re-executed, then signed off by a maintainer before it counts as a finding.

The rules

Falsifiable
State the hypothesis with a metric and a number that would prove it wrong. “Is X related to Y?” is a topic; “AUC above 0.7 on the held-out cohort” is a test.
Public data only
Literature APIs and open datasets. No patient-level or personal data.
No clinical claims
Medical questions describe the evidence; they never recommend treatment.
Nothing that helps harm
We decline work that could help enhance or adapt a pathogen or toxin, or any other dual-use research.
One sentence an educated non-specialist can follow.
The prediction, the metric, and the threshold that would refute it.
APIs, registries, datasets: links help.
Who benefits if the answer is yes, and why now.
So a maintainer can reply.

We use your email only to reply to this message. Nothing you send here is published. By sending it you accept the Terms and have read how we use your data. Please do not include personal data of others or any patient data.

No choice saved yet: optional storage is off. Changing it here takes effect at once. Every cookie we use